Tri-Alliance International Inc.CON1 · CON2 Applications
Language English

The Tri-Alliance

Applications Now Open

Two independent membership routes within one Tri-Alliance governance architecture.

Membership is a formal status admitted under the Founding Charter; it is distinct from participation or partnership. CON2 evaluation — and submission where the Charter-required threshold is met — is the constitutional precondition for CON1 review.

AI capability is not AI authority.

Applications now open

CON1Governance Review Consortium

For qualified institutions, including governments and public institutions

CON1 is the Tri-Alliance’s independent governance review and institutional determination component, established under the Tri-Alliance Founding Charter v2.0.

Who may apply

Qualified institutions, including governments and public institutions. A broader range of institutions is proposed in Founding Charter v2.1, which has not yet been adopted.

Status

Founding Charter v2.0 governs. The proposed revisions have not yet been adopted. Applicants are candidates, not Members, until formally admitted.

Role and independence

CON1 independently reviews qualifying matters submitted through CON2 and reaches the institutional determination — endorsement, conditional endorsement, decline, or no determination — through the Charter’s quorum and voting machinery.

CON1 Membership does not require agreement with GIC. GIC may present evidence and respond to review, but has voice — not a vote — in the determination of its own submission.

CON1 Membership is a formal institutional status, distinct from mere participation or partnership. It does not, by itself, transfer ownership or operational control of GIC, and a CON1 determination is not a guarantee of commercial deployment.

How a CON1 determination is reached

Quorum requires at least two-thirds of applicable CON1 Membership and a minimum of five Members. Endorsement, Conditional Endorsement or Decline requires 75% of participating entitled voters. Where that threshold is not met, the result is No Determination / Further Review.

Evidence informs the determination; evidence does not itself constitute the determination.

Eligibility and admission

Proposed in Founding Charter v2.1 (not yet adopted): a broadened CON1 open to governments and public institutions, international and multilateral organizations, NGOs and civil society, professional bodies, research institutions, qualified corporations and other qualified institutions.

Under the proposed revisions, CON1 admissions would be decided by the board of Tri-Alliance International Inc. against published criteria, with the Constitutional Secretariat verifying applications and recording each decision.

Proposed (not yet adopted): no more than ten institutional Members per region. Candidate stages and reconsideration have not yet been decided.

Deadline — Open

Applications are considered in the order received. Receipt of an application does not imply admission.

Apply as a CON1 candidate
Applications now open

CON2Research & Evaluation Consortium

For universities, researchers, professionals and qualified organizations

CON2 is the Tri-Alliance’s independent research, challenge, testing and evaluation component, established under the Tri-Alliance Founding Charter v2.0.

Who may apply

Universities, individual researchers and professionals, and qualified organizations. CON2 is not restricted to work originating with GIC.

Status

Founding Charter v2.0 governs. The authority that decides CON2 admissions has not yet been determined. Applicants are candidates, not Members, until formally admitted.

Role and independence

CON2 independently researches, challenges, tests and evaluates qualifying service modules, and determines whether the Charter-required threshold for submission to CON1 has been met.

CON2 Membership does not require agreement with GIC. Members remain free to reach findings, conclusions and recommendations contrary to GIC’s expectations or commercial interests.

CON2 Membership is a formal status under the Charter, distinct from participation or partnership. A CON2 submission is not an endorsement of the module it evaluates, and not every evaluation reaches the submission threshold.

How a CON2 submission is reached

Submission to CON1 requires at least two-thirds of the applicable CON2 decision-making Membership.

No participant shall be penalized solely for legitimate independent findings or reasoned dissent.

Eligibility and admission

The authority that decides CON2 admissions has not yet been determined.

Candidate stages and reconsideration have not yet been decided.

Deadline — Open

Applications are considered in the order received. Receipt of an application does not imply admission.

Apply as a CON2 candidate

Governing documents

Founding Charter v2.0 and Manifesto 5.0 remain the governing texts until any revision is formally adopted.

Governing

Tri-Alliance Founding Charter v2.0

The controlling constitutional source for CON1, CON2 and the Tri-Alliance architecture. Where any inconsistency, ambiguity or difference of interpretation arises between the governing documents, the Founding Charter v2.0 prevails.

Open the Founding Charter (PDF)

Proposed — not adopted

Proposed successors: Founding Charter v2.1 and Manifesto 5.1

Being prepared. Among other changes, they would name CON1 the Governance Review Consortium and broaden it so that its defining requirement is independent institutional judgment rather than governmental identity alone. Until they are adopted, v2.0 and 5.0 — which use the earlier name “Governmental Review Consortium” — remain the governing texts.

Candidate packages and who issues them

The CON1 candidate-information package is issued by Tri-Alliance International Inc. The currently available CON2 package, Version 1.1, was issued by GIC. Its proposed successor, Version 1.2, will be issued by Tri-Alliance International Inc.

GIC presents · CON2 evaluates and decides whether to submit · only upon a CON2 submission does CON1 review and determine · GIC decides whether and how to deploy.

Evidence informs the determination. Evidence does not itself constitute the determination.